Quick Summary
- President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has revived calls to prohibit betting in Brazil.
- The Brazilian Institute of Responsible Gaming (IBJR) reports operators contributed BRL 9.95 billion ($2 billion) in taxes in 2025.
- Industry claims a ban would drive bettors to illegal markets, undermining regulation and state revenue.
- Ongoing debate highlights tensions between public health, fiscal priorities, and black-market risks.
What Happened
A renewed political push to ban betting in Brazil has provoked a sharp response from the country’s regulated gambling sector. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, revisiting a historically contentious issue, has advocated for reinstating restrictions on gambling activities, including sports betting.
In response, the Brazilian Institute of Responsible Gaming (IBJR) — a major representative body of licensed betting operators — raised alarms about the potential fallout of such measures. The IBJR underscored the sector’s substantial fiscal contribution, citing BRL 9.95 billion (approximately $2 billion) paid in taxes in 2025 alone. The group warned that prohibitive policy threatens both government revenues and consumer protections by incentivizing a shift back to the black market.
Why It Matters
At stake is the future of Brazil’s newly regulated betting industry, which has taken significant steps toward legitimacy in recent years. The boom in legal sports betting, driven by regulatory reforms and market appetite, has not only created new commercial opportunities but also delivered a vital stream of tax income for federal and state governments.
A move to reimpose a betting ban would undermine these gains. The IBJR argues that removing the legal framework would leave consumers vulnerable to unlicensed operators. Unregulated markets are historically linked with reduced oversight, inadequate responsible gambling measures, and greater risk of criminal activity such as match-fixing and payment fraud.
Moreover, banning regulated betting rarely eliminates demand. Instead, it frequently pushes activity underground, making enforcement more difficult and removing vital channelization tools. For the Brazilian treasury — which, per official figures, has already benefited from almost BRL 10 billion in licensing and tax payments last year — the fiscal consequences would be significant. Without lawful operators, these funds would evaporate, further stressing public finance at a time when the country faces competing priorities in health, education, and infrastructure.
Critics of Lula’s revived prohibitionist stance also point out that the black market easily fills the void left by legal operators. Past experience in Latin America and globally has shown that outright bans rarely reduce gambling prevalence; they simply shift the market from licensed, tax-paying entities to shadowy offshore operators. This not only deprives governments of revenue, but undermines efforts to monitor and combat gambling-related harm.
Industry Context
Brazil represents one of the world’s most closely watched gambling markets, having only recently opened the door to regulated sports betting after years of prohibition. The 2018 legalization of fixed-odds sports betting was a landmark that ended decades of regulatory limbo. Implementation was, however, slow, with full licensing and regulatory frameworks taking years to finalize. The first official betting licences were only issued in 2024.
The regulated sector’s rapid growth speaks to long-suppressed consumer demand and broader trends in Latin America, where countries such as Colombia and Argentina have liberalized their gambling sectors with an eye on state revenues and player protection. The IBJR, made up of major industry stakeholders, has positioned itself as a defender of orderly, regulated growth and transparent industry oversight.
Elsewhere, attempts to roll back regulated gambling have yielded mixed results. Taiwan’s recent crackdown pushed much of the market offshore; meanwhile, in Italy and the UK, where regulation and high taxation persist, authorities continue to battle parallel black markets. These international precedents serve as cautionary tales for Brazil’s legislators as they weigh prohibitionist rhetoric against practical realities.
Regulatory Background
Betting and most other forms of gambling were effectively banned in Brazil for decades, until a relaxation of laws under Law No. 13,756/2018 permitted fixed-odds sports wagering in a regulated context. The law laid the groundwork for licensure, operational standards, and a tax regime requiring both gross gaming revenue and regulatory fees.
Despite initial delays, regulated betting finally launched with a handful of licensees in 2024. Each operator is subject to significant tax obligations, licensing fees, mandatory contributions to social projects, and strict consumer protection requirements overseen by the Ministry of Finance. Calls to tighten or reverse these reforms have remained politically divisive, pitting fiscal conservatives and public health advocates against advocates of regulated liberalization.
What Happens Next
As the industry and government remain at loggerheads, Brazil’s National Congress and regulatory authorities will need to weigh evidence from the regulated sector, international policy benchmarks, and public sentiment. The IBJR and allied stakeholders are expected to intensify lobbying and public engagement efforts to safeguard the regulated betting market’s future, emphasizing its benefits to state revenue, player protection, and economic development.
Sources
This article is for informational purposes only. 31Casino does not provide gambling services or recommendations. If you're concerned about your gambling, visit our Responsible Gambling page for support resources.

