Lead brief
New data from ScamInfo.ai reveals only two out of 291 gambling domains achieved a trusted rating, with over one in four considered high or critical risk. The findings underscore major cybersecurity and regulatory challenges for global online gambling safety.
Coverage frame
This piece sits inside the wider 31Casino news desk, where single developments are read against regulation, market structure, and reader relevance.
Primary source base
- ▸ScamInfo.ai analyzed 7,185 websites across 40 sectors, including 291 gambling domains.
- ▸Only two gambling sites received a "trusted" safety rating, while over 25% were high or critical risk.
- ▸Gambling and betting sites accounted for more than a third of all high-risk platforms identified.
- ▸Findings raise pressing questions about player protection, regulatory reach, and industry reputation.
What Happened
A new analysis by cybersecurity platform ScamInfo.ai has raised significant alarms regarding the safety standards of online gambling sites. The evaluation, involving 7,185 websites across over 40 online sectors, found that the gambling and betting industry accounts for nearly 35% of all high-risk platforms on the internet. Out of 291 gambling domains assessed, only two achieved ScamInfo.ai's top "trusted" rating, while more than one in four were flagged as high or critical risk.
The study, released in June 2026, identifies online gambling as one of the most dangerous digital sectors for potential scams, fraudulent activity, and player exploitation. The cyber risk assessment considered a variety of factors including website security, domain reputation, transparency of operations, and regulatory legitimacy.
Only 2 out of 291 domains — Less than 1% of gambling websites earned ScamInfo.ai’s highest trust rating, indicating widespread risk in this sector.
Why It Matters
The figures presented by ScamInfo.ai highlight long-standing concerns around consumer protection within the global online gambling sector. While online betting and gaming have experienced tremendous growth over the past decade, questions about platform integrity, regulatory enforcement, and player security have intensified in parallel.
The fact that just two gambling sites were rated "trusted" shows a gap between regulatory frameworks and the reality of the digital marketplace. Players are frequently exposed to fraudulent operators, unlicensed providers, and manipulated platforms. The risks often go beyond financial fraud, encompassing data theft, unfair gaming practices, and unresolved disputes.
For regulators and policymakers, the findings point to the limits of current oversight mechanisms, given the persistent scale of unsafe and rogue operators accessible to consumers worldwide. Within licensed jurisdictions, national regulators enforce strict technical and ethical standards, yet their authority rarely extends to offshore or unlicensed sites targeting players across borders. The widespread presence of high-risk gambling sites also poses reputational damage to the industry, undermining trust and complicating responsible gambling efforts.
Industry Context
The ScamInfo.ai data reflects broader challenges faced by the online gambling industry as it contends with sophisticated cyber threats, evolving scam tactics, and the ongoing proliferation of unregulated platforms. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, the gambling sector has historically attracted criminal elements due to its transactional volume, player anonymity, and complex payment arrangements. Jurisdictions like the United Kingdom, Malta, and the Netherlands have tightened compliance requirements for license holders, including robust know-your-customer (KYC) processes and technical audits. Even so, hundreds of websites continue to operate outside these frameworks, often marketing directly to vulnerable or poorly protected audiences.
Online casinos and sports betting platforms have also become targets for phishing schemes, malware injections, and imitation scams, exploiting the general surge in digital wagering activity since the COVID-19 pandemic. The sector’s response strategy now requires not only heightened due diligence by operators but also improved education for consumers about the hallmarks of reputable betting sites.
Regulatory Background
Efforts to regulate gambling websites vary sharply across jurisdictions. Leading regulators like the UK Gambling Commission, Malta Gaming Authority, and the Dutch KSA implement strict licence vetting, ongoing compliance monitoring, and public blacklists for known rogue sites. However, gaps in global cooperation and digital jurisdiction mean that many high-risk or non-compliant sites continue to evade enforcement.
Some jurisdictions lack the technical capacity or legislative framework to block unlicensed operators, relying instead on consumer advisories and payment blocking attempts. Player recourse against offshore scams is often limited, and international cross-border cooperation remains sparse despite repeated calls from policy experts. The ScamInfo.ai report provides fresh impetus for harmonising cybersecurity and licensing standards as part of international regulatory modernization.
What Happens Next
The cybersecurity sector’s focus on gambling and betting sites is likely to intensify as new scam detection technologies evolve and more data becomes available. Regulators may use evidence from platforms like ScamInfo.ai to inform enforcement actions, licensing policies, and public awareness campaigns. For players, the findings reinforce the necessity of using only licensed, well-vetted betting sites under jurisdictional oversight.
Sources
This article is for informational purposes only. 31Casino does not provide gambling services or recommendations. If you're concerned about your gambling, visit our Responsible Gambling page for support resources.

