Skip to main content
Licensed & Regulated
Expert Reviews
Responsible Gambling
18+
Responsible gamblingeurope

Only 2 of 591 Gambling Sites Rated as Trusted, ScamInfo.ai Study Reveals

A 2026 ScamInfo.ai study found that just 2 out of 591 gambling sites received a trusted rating, highlighting widespread site safety concerns in the global online gambling sector. This revelation underscores the urgency for enhanced player protection and regulatory scrutiny across jurisdictions.

Published
June 27, 2026
Read time
5 min
Sources
1 cited
31Casino editorial news image for responsible-gambling: Only 2 of 591 Gambling Sites Rated as Trusted, ScamInfo.ai Study Reveals
AI-generated illustration

Article overview

This report reads a live market development through the lenses that matter most on 31Casino: regulation, operator conduct, and the likely effect on ordinary players trying to understand what changed.

Focus

Responsible gambling coverage with europe market context.

Reporting basis

1 cited sources across 1 source domains.

Updated reading

Sources reviewed through Jun 27, 2026.

Reader takeaway

Gambling news matters most when it does more than repeat a headline. The useful question is what the development changes for market clarity, compliance, and player trust.

europeangaming.eu

Lead brief

A 2026 ScamInfo.ai study found that just 2 out of 591 gambling sites received a trusted rating, highlighting widespread site safety concerns in the global online gambling sector. This revelation underscores the urgency for enhanced player protection and regulatory scrutiny across jurisdictions.

Coverage frame

This piece sits inside the wider 31Casino news desk, where single developments are read against regulation, market structure, and reader relevance.

Primary source base

europeangaming.eu
Quick Summary
  • Only 2 out of 591 gambling websites evaluated by ScamInfo.ai earned a trusted rating in their latest security study.
  • Gambling and betting sites represented the highest risk category for critical-risk domains.
  • The findings have sparked fresh concern about player safety and the efficacy of existing online gambling regulations.
  • The results highlight persistent gaps in industry-wide standards for site security and player protection.

What Happened

In a comprehensive study published in June 2026, cybersecurity firm ScamInfo.ai examined 591 gambling and betting websites for safety, security, and trustworthiness. The review assessed each site’s domain integrity, anti-fraud measures, encryption standards, and compliance with best practices for player protection.

According to the published findings, only 2 sites out of the entire sample achieved a "trusted" label, the highest ranking offered by ScamInfo.ai’s analytical framework. The majority of sites were identified as posing "critical risk" to users, primarily due to vulnerabilities, insufficient player safeguards, and questionable domain legitimacy.

💡

2 out of 591 — the number of gambling websites identified as trusted underscores a huge gap in site safety within the global gambling sector.

Why It Matters

The discovery that over 99% of reviewed gambling sites failed to earn a trusted rating has far-reaching implications for both consumers and regulators. The online gambling market has grown rapidly worldwide, with new brands and platforms launching at an unprecedented pace. However, the industry’s progress has not always been matched by improvements in consumer protection.

For players, the findings represent a serious warning. Insufficient site security, lax verification processes, and unclear ownership details potentially expose users to fraud, theft of personal data, and unfair or rigged gameplay. Moreover, players may have little recourse if their funds are lost or mishandled by sites operating outside robust regulatory oversight.

From a regulatory perspective, the data raises questions about the effectiveness of current frameworks designed to weed out bad actors. Many countries have made legislative efforts in recent years to tighten requirements for licensing, anti-money laundering, and technical security. Yet, the results from ScamInfo.ai suggest that these measures are either inconsistently applied or insufficient in practice, especially in unlicensed and offshore segments.

The size of the critical-risk segment in iGaming domains reflects not just a technical failure, but a systemic issue regarding accountability, transparency, and enforcement. As more players seek entertainment online, expectations for baseline site safety have grown. The current trust gap could erode confidence in regulated markets and encourage further migration to unlicensed operators, compounding the risks to consumers.

Industry Context

The 2026 ScamInfo.ai findings arrive at a time when the online gambling sector is both expanding rapidly and facing new compliance challenges. Many operators point to rising costs for regulatory technology, compliance staff, and independent certification as barriers to meeting higher standards. Additionally, the borderless nature of online gambling makes consistent enforcement difficult, especially with brands targeting multiple jurisdictions from loosely regulated bases.

International organizations, such as the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA), have long called for harmonized standards on site safety, responsible gambling, and technical requirements. The gulf between regulated operators with strong player protection protocols and those lacking even basic security controls remains stark. High-profile regulatory crackdowns in the UK, Netherlands, and other markets have prompted some improvements, but much of the global sector remains fragmented.

These findings also coincide with a growing focus on responsible gambling. As debates on industry duty of care intensify, the ability of any operator to pass independent trust verification could become a core standard in future licensing decisions.

Regulatory Background

Jurisdictions across Europe and beyond have steadily increased licensing scrutiny and imposed higher standards for online gambling operators in response to consumer harm. The UK Gambling Commission, Malta Gaming Authority, and Dutch Kansspelautoriteit are among those requiring operators to demonstrate compliance with technical security and anti-money laundering standards.

However, gaps persist in cross-border collaboration and enforcement. Offshore sites catering to grey-market players frequently evade these frameworks, with patchwork coverage driving inconsistencies in site quality and accountability. ScamInfo.ai’s results reflect not just isolated failures, but an industry-wide challenge that established regulators, new market entrants, and technology providers must address collaboratively.

What Happens Next

In light of these findings, regulatory authorities and industry groups are likely to revisit technical and procedural standards for online gambling site accreditation. Broader adoption of independent site verification, increased penalties for non-compliance, and more robust international cooperation are all potential responses. For now, the report serves as a stark reminder of the importance of due diligence for both consumers and regulators in assessing the safety of online gambling platforms.

Sources


This article is for informational purposes only. 31Casino does not provide gambling services or recommendations. If you're concerned about your gambling, visit our Responsible Gambling page for support resources.

Source appendix

Research trail for this article

The reporting below is grounded in publicly accessible material reviewed for this story. Source pages are listed individually so readers can trace the original record.